Strong Naming Assemblies - Silverlight

Topics: Prism v2 - Silverlight 2
Feb 20, 2009 at 8:23 PM
Hello, is there a best practice or guidance on whether silverlight assemblies should be strong named? We have a standard to strong name assemblies and I noticed that the CAL assemblies are not strong named. Is there a reason for this? Should I just strong name the CAL assemblies and move on?

Thanks in advance.
Feb 21, 2009 at 12:33 PM
I can't tell the exact reason for this, but they're mentioning in the documentation that CAL is ships in source code form so you've to strongname and compile it before use.

This is what I also did.